Article content
The organization WikiLeaks recently published a file of leaked emails from the well-known American politician John Podesta, which became quite a big affair.
These emails, among other interesting things, also contain a revelation concerning what is apparently currently the most widely used artificial sweetener, which is found in thousands of different foods and medicines.
What the emails revealed about aspartame
In addition to pointing out the frighteningly dangerous health consequences of consuming aspartame (E951), the emails also contained descriptions of the frauds that accompanied the approval process of this artificial sweetener.
According to the portal Wise Mind Healthy Body (Bystrá mysl, zdravé tělo) the emails in question were sent to Podesta by Mrs. Wendy Abrams.
They read as follows:
“I have a friend who worked for scientists at the University of Chicago, where a top neurology department is located. The doctors stated that when they gave mice aspartame to eat, it literally made holes in their brains.
As they furthermore stated, they would rather give a pregnant woman alcohol to drink than a non-alcoholic beverage sweetened with aspartame. It’s that bad. “
In the messages exchanged between Wendy Abrams and Don Kennedy, it is further written about how aspartame was originally approved:
“The day after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration as President of the USA on 21.1.1981 the company Searle (the original inventor of aspartame, today part of Monsanto) for the second time filed an application for approval of aspartame as an artificial sweetener. Previously aspartame had been banned.
Arthur Hayes Hull, Reagan’s new director of the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA), appointed a five-member scientific commission to assess this application.
When it became clear that the commission would confirm the ban on aspartame by a vote of 3:2, Hull added a sixth member to the commission so that the result of the vote would be a tie 3:3. Subsequently Hull personally filed a suit in favor of approving aspartame. “
If aspartame is unsuitable for human consumption, why is it then added to thousands of foods and medicines?
The organization Mission Possible World Health International is an exhaustive resource on the issue of aspartame. Its founder Dr. Betty Martini has devoted years to exposing the dangers of this chemical.
Aspartame is today found almost everywhere – in sweetened drinks, chewing gums, confectionery and even in many medicines and vitamin supplements.
Here are a few examples of information that can be found on that site:
1. The FDA list includes 92 documented symptoms of aspartame consumption, including illnesses such as:
- anxiety and depression
- fatigue
- headaches, irritability and dizziness
- vertigo (dizziness)
- insomnia, weakness
- weight gain, loss of appetite
- sexual dysfunction
- joint pains
- nerve numbness
- ringing in the ears
- blurred vision, even blindness
- rashes and eczema
2. Serious chronic diseases associated with aspartame include:
- multiple sclerosis
- fibromyalgia
- chronic fatigue syndrome
- Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases
- diabetes
- mental retardation
- lymphomas (cancer of the lymph nodes)
- DNA damage
- birth defects or even death
3. Aspartame creates addiction, is neurotoxic, teratogenic, carcinogenic and moreover excitotoxic. It is a substance that has no place in the human diet.
Bad people make bad decisions
It is easy to understand that greed and corruption are enough for our food chain to be contaminated by poisons such as aspartame.
The clash between the government, pharmaceutical companies and food manufacturers thus became a fact and a part of our lives.
One more fact should be mentioned here in conclusion – Donald Rumsfeld, who held high posts in the American government, was simultaneously a director of the company Searle at the time when the FDA was approving their application for aspartame’s authorization.
But does this controversy have a deeper, more insidious level?
After all, if certain forces can manipulate us into voluntarily paying for food poisoned with toxins and thus damaging our health and our brain as a source of logical thought, isn’t that also a way to more easily control the population for their global agenda?
We have become sick and weakened people who are dependent on external support.
On the other hand, strong and healthy people would be able to choose their own path and resist efforts toward social conformity. Such people, however, would be feared by governments and corporations.
